|via Simon and Schuster|
Looking at the UCL-Lancet Commission on Managing the Health Effects of Climate Change report and one thing becomes clear; the future is going to be so much worse than we think.
As the project summary says:
The report is already six years old, and the major problems identified still haven't made it into public discussion in North America. As the Lancet editorial opens:A major report on managing the health effects of climate change, launched jointly by The Lancet and UCL, says that climate change is the biggest global health threat of the 21st century.The commission reviewed the likely health impacts of climate change on human societies – and documented ways to reverse those impacts. It concluded that there is a need for policymakers, practitioners and the public to act urgently on the human health effects of climate change.
Climate change will have its greatest impact on those who are alreadyClimate change and the projected effects of a changing climate develop quickly into a highly complex group of inter-related problems: including disease, food, water and sanitation, shelter and settlements, extreme events, population and migration, and politics.
the poorest in the world: it will deepen inequities and the effects of global warming will shape the future of health among all peoples. Yet this message has failed to penetrate most public discussion about climate change. And health professionals have barely begun to engage
with an issue that should be a major focal point for their research, preparedness planning, and advocacy [...].
In the Commonwealth Health Ministers briefing on food [pdf], the study points out the following:
- Climate change will worsen any existing food insecurity--anything bad now will only get worse.
- The changes brought about by global warming will necessitate changes to agricultural practices--this is everything from what is grown, where it is grown, to how it is grown. But when it comes to the necessity of using GMOs, "the Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (also known as the World Agriculture Report), which was written by over 400 scientists, rejects that view. It sees ‘...a major role for agricultural knowledge, science and technology...to increase adaptive capacity and enhance resilience through purposeful biodiversity management’. The options set forth include ‘...irrigation management, water harvesting and conservation technologies, diversification of agriculture systems, the protection of agro-biodiversity and screening germ-plasm for tolerance to climate change."
- The globalised food and agriculture system serves the interests of large
corporations, while neglecting the needs of the increased numbers of
hungry people. Can't say that much clearer, can you?
- Agricultural practices and the global food system are major contributors to global warming. So, business as usual is just not an option.
- The current methods of dealing with disaster and distributing food
aid tend not to alleviate the long-term situation, often resulting in
dependency upon aid. And that doesn't solve any long-term problems.
- The impact of climate change on global food security, and in turn the public health risks, need to be tackled holistically. Simply put, there's no single solution. Because the problem is the system, the system must be attacked simultaneously from multiple angles in multiple ways. Which is good, because the only way the system can be taken down is to hit it hard, hit it fast, and hit it in so many ways that the corporations cannot respond effectively.
Film: ‘Managing the Health Effects of Climate Change’